Three million U.S. psychopaths – their minds are different!

Snakes In Suits
Snakes In Suits

In the book Snakes In Suits I learned several surprising items about psychopaths. An early researcher named Hervey Cleckley said that he found that psychopaths used language differently from most people; their sentence structure, choice of words and tempo (or beat) were different. He (and others) also noticed that psychopaths have difficulty understanding the emotional content of words that add color and interest to communication.
They would often describe their most atrocious crimes with dispassion and disinterest, showing no emotion at all.

MRI tests show that the response of these people to emotional words and pictures is no different than to neutral material, which is not the way normal people’s brains react. In fact, the limbic regions of the brain, which are associated with emotion, do not get activated in psychopaths when they see these words and pictures – instead the regions that get activated are involved with the production and understanding of language.
It should be said that not all evil people are psychopaths. My guess from the book is that someone like Hitler, who believed in something bigger than himself and could be very emotional, was not a psychopath, even if he caused mass death and misery.

The crimes of Psychopaths tend to be more violent than those of other criminals, but their aggression tends to be predatory – cold-blooded and devoid of the intense emotional upheaval that typically accompanies violent acts of other people.

They make up about 15% of the prison population. The rest of the prisoners may be sociopaths or fall into other categories. Psychopathy is a distinct personality disorder with distinct characteristics.

Psychopaths can get into high positions in business, which is what “Snakes In Suits” is about. They can evaluate people by how useful these people are to them, and they can study them and befriend them on their way to betraying them.

Psychopaths usually don’t want to commit themselves to a long course of study. They want to get results quick. So we could wonder – would they be attracted to politics? You can be a career politician without much preparation. And you can promise your consituents what they want to hear. And once in power, you have power over where large quantities of money goes – and some of that power can direct money to you.

But this raises some questions. Are psychopaths just practical types who want money? If that is the case, then as long as you are not in their way, or useful to them, then they should leave you alone, unlike some ideologues such as Mao, or Stalin, or Hitler.
Do psychopaths flock to certain types of organizations – such as the Mafia?
Do psychopaths ever believe in ideologies?
Do psychopaths have a malignant, sadistic, personality?
Can we blame psychopaths for their actions, knowing that their limbic system is not activated when it should be? Or that twin studies show that the core features of the psychopath are strongly genetically determined?

A depressing fact is that Psychopathic men can leave many children, by several women, which may be a genetic advantage to this intra-species predator.

Even if we cannot fully blame psychopaths, the way we could blame a normal person, it seems we should blame ourselves not to understand that some of the people we may encounter are like creatures from another planet that have evolved not to have a conscience as far as humans go. They look like ordinary folk, and they behave like ordinary folk, and then they can suddenly treat us the way a wolf treats a sheep. They can charm people and they can manipulate people. They know the difference between right and wrong, but that doesn’t stop them.
According to Robert Hare they make up 1% of the population. In a country of over 300 million people, that is 3 million psychopaths. Some of them are violent, some are not, but any association with them is detrimental.

One thing I will say from my own experience – when people don’t have a conscience, they have the most shocking imagination and do things that would not even occur to the rest of us. The reality can be so huge, and the acts so evil, that they are almost incomprehensible. And if they have an agenda to deceive, we will be taken in, because we cannot conceive of the magnitude of their actions and of their deception.

Now if we go out on a limb, and assume a single mutation in a single gene produces the psychopath, then an entire cluster of traits can develop if that gene is involved in development of the brain. I remember an example of a Russian scientist ( Dmitri Belyaev and his successors) who tried to create friendly foxes. He took the tamest and friendliest fox of each generation, and bred them. He did get friendly foxes, but they also had other traits – they barked like dogs, they wagged their tails, and they had color patterns like dogs.

I think this is because a gene that affects development can be used in multiple contexts for multiple purposes.

Also if it affects how neurons migrate for example, it might affect a whole slew of unrelated mental abilities and personality traits.

Unfortunately, apart from the slightly different tempo of speech, we can not detect the psychopath. We can look at him or her, and have no clue. We cannot see the brain through the eyes.

Source: Snakes In Suits by Paul Babiak, Ph.D. And Robert D. Hare, Ph.D.
Interesting Site:

Also see the video at which discusses MRI scans that found that psychopaths have a deficient amygdala (an organ dealing with emotion in the brain).


4 thoughts on “Three million U.S. psychopaths – their minds are different!

  1. I cannot discuss the matter here, but I just feel like saying that the whole neuroscience stuff is, when it comes to morals and psychic disorders, really confused. Neither psychopathy nor evil in general is caused by dysfunctions in the brain (it is rather the other way round). The point is that we do not want to find out psychopaths because they use collective values and norms in a way that reveals their corrupt nature. I.e., the collective urge that haunts most people is itself psychopathic in character; something that becomes obvious when you think of the bully and the cowards that back her up. This terrible and typical pattern does not depend on dysfunctions in the brain – or else most of the pupils in any school, employees in any work-place, etc., have dysfunctional brains.
    If there has been a strong historical trend, it is to externalise evil: “Its not me. Its the devil, its an illness, its the genes, its the brain….” The main thing has always been: It cannot and must not be a concern of MINE. So, the biggest lie is the one who tells us that something evil or “psychological” is external to me.

  2. One way to get a handle on this discussion is to go back to The Mask of Sanity by Hervey Cleckley where he follows the evolution for defining Psychopath to Sociopath to present day Antisocial Personality Disorder. Cleckley makes the observation that despite the the recent move away from character to behavior analysis, the larger discussion is about empathy, specifically the lack of empathy, and the ways this emotional deficit impacts behavior.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s